Of course, this doesn’t mean that everything you write has to be unmistakably yours. Writing is an art form as well, and it’s often possible to guess who wrote a piece without seeing the author’s name. You can usually identify a song’s artist just by hearing a few notes, even if it’s a song you’ve never heard before. You can often tell who painted a picture just by looking at the style. You have your own styleĮvery good writer has his or her own style.
BECOMING A GREAT STORYTELLER IN PDF FULL VERSION
That’s all just a scam to get you to pay for the full version of Grammarly! (FYI: I’m only half-joking here.) Bottom line: If you’re a good writer, you’re probably very good with grammar. And I never bother with the so-called “advanced” issues. From my own experience, about one out of every three critical issues isn’t a real grammatical mistake. Just keep in mind that not everything flagged by Grammarly is actually a mistake. If you’re a good writer, you probably won’t have too many mistakes. You can do something as simple as dumping your final draft into a tool like Grammarly. So how do you know if you’re grammatically proficient? No, you don’t have to diagram every sentence you write. Rather, you need to have a firm grasp on all the rules and be able to apply them in your own writing without thinking too hard about it. Notice how this says “grammatically proficient.” It doesn’t mean you have to be a grammar scholar. If your grammar is such a trainwreck that people generally struggle to comprehend what you write, then you aren’t a good writer. Here are 7 signs you’re a good writer: You’re grammatically proficientįirst and foremost, you have to be a technically good writer in order to be a good writer. You don’t necessarily have to nail all seven of these items in order to be a good writer, but you should be able to check off at least a few of them. So let’s talk about seven things that prove you’re a master of your craft. You didn’t come here to find out if you’re effective. We’re talking about being a good writer here. On the other hand, if I write a novel about teenage vampires that’s routinely slammed as being shitty writing but sells millions of copies and makes me super rich, then I’d call that pretty fucking effective.īut screw effectiveness. But if no one other than these so-called preeminent scholars read it, and if that piece of writing doesn’t make me any money and produce any other results relative to my goals, then it isn’t very effective.
If I create a flawless piece of writing that is held in high esteem as being objectively good by all the preeminent scholars, then that’s certainly an accomplishment as well as a sign that I’m good. He went on to talk about how it’s more important to be effective than it is to be good. To be fair, the blogger I’m talking about wasn’t just copping out on what “good” writing is. And bad writers are never successful (although there are plenty of mediocre ones who are). Hell, good writers might produce more bad than good. Good writers occasionally write bad stuff. Apparently, according to this guy, it’s impossible to say whether you’re a good writer or if the thing you’ve written is any good because “good” is subjective. But this time there was actually some decent insight. Then I received another email a couple days later with the subject line “Is it any good?” It was from the same writer, and once again it was self-promotional.
0 kommentar(er)
